Re: [ihc] no IH content, but fun--

[bearbvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Greg Hermann)]

At 1:18 PM 10/26/04, Steven Stegmann wrote:
>Ryan,
>
>I sure wouldn't want something that complicated in a
>car, let alone an airplane.  I agree completely.
>
>It still is a fascinating engine.  BTW there were
>several variants in the way the turbines were handled.
> I have some pix and will try to find a few minutes to
>check out the differences.  Seems like there was one
>with a mechanical supercharger and an exhaust turbine
>connected to the output shaft.  Not sure about that.

Well--Holset MAKES such turbines. I believe Mack uses just such a thing to
drive a fan to pull air over an air to air IC---
>
Greg