Re: [ihc] Re: ihc-digest V7 #425

["Ryan Moore" <baradium@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Colin M Rush" <salmineo@domain.elided>
To: <ihc@domain.elided>
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2004 03:44
Subject: [ihc] Re: ihc-digest V7 #425


> The first question that comes to my mind is:  Why?
>
> If one needed a real anvil, it should be iron, not brass or bronze.  If
> it is just supposed to be a paperweight, what connection is there between
> IHC and anvils that is supposed to be showcased/memorialized?  I know
> they made just about everything at one time or other, but I have never
> seen an example of their anvilsmithing capabilities.
>
> -Colin Rush
>

Did you miss the discussion previously about the IHC anvil?  The full sized
one?  ;)

I think there was one on ebay too, but the shipping alone for it was more
than it was going for.

Thanks,
Ryan


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.647 / Virus Database: 414 - Release Date: 3/29/04