RE: [ihc] Gearing question

["Ed Sohm" <idaemes@xxxxxxxxxx>]

For me it would be close enough, but I hate to recommend it to anyone
else.  

Ed


-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Moore [mailto:baradium@domain.elided] 
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 1:43 PM
To: Ed Sohm; 'Rocky Lear'; ihc-digest@domain.elided
Subject: Re: [ihc] Gearing question



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Sohm" <idaemes@domain.elided>
To: "'Rocky Lear'" <rockylear@domain.elided>; <ihc-digest@domain.elided>
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 12:46
Subject: RE: [ihc] Gearing question


> Why not 4.30s in back and 4.27 in front? Less than 1% difference. 4wd
> only on _very_ slick surfaces of course.
>
> Randy's ring and pinion site seems to be down right now, seems like
you
> can get 4.27s for a Dana 70.
>
> Tom M had 4.30s made for his Dana 60, maybe he will chime in with cost
> and such.
>
> Ed

Isn't 4.27 close enough to 4.30 to not even care about the surface for
4x4?
You get more difference than that if you turn at all.

-Ryan


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.647 / Virus Database: 414 - Release Date: 3/30/04