IHC/IHC Digest Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ihc] RHD vs. LHD steering boxes
> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:34:14 -0700
> From: Joel M Brodsky <jmbrodsky@domain.elided>
> Subject: [ihc] RHD vs. LHD steering boxes
The chore is in locating a box that mounts in the proper position.
There isn't one. The only RHD box out there is a manual box. Can't get
power on that. The only boxes I know of that mount on the RHS of the
frame rail are the mythic T/A box, the Ford box mentioned earlier in
this thread, and a Corvette box from (IIRC) the '60s. None of which
(AFAIK) share the same mounting hole pattern. Any solution, it would
seem, requires some fabrication. Personally, on an 258 equipped Scout,
I think fabricating a pump bracket is probably easier than drilling and
sleeving the frame. But that's just me. On a V8 Scout, you'll have to
drill new holes anyway so you might as well mount the box in a spot
where it's natural movement will work.
Dave
>
> Couldn't one take the input shaft, worm and sector shaft from a LHD box and
> put it the RHD box and vice versa? Thus making a correct rotation box? It
> doesn't seem like too big of a chore.
>
> JoelB
>
> I'm going to file this info away. On a vehicle with the straight 6
> cylinder engine, the LHD P/S box can work. On a vehicle with a V8 you
> run into problems - that trick won't work. You either do the Ford box
> switch, OR you get the "mythic Travelall box" and use that. Yes, I know
> it rotates in the wrong direction, but if you can mount it far enough
> forward on the frame rail, it should work. Either solution requires
> some degree of fabrication, but at least the T/A box is a legitimate IHC
> part. And may save you some work with the pitman arm - I'm not sure on
> that part. Even if you could reverse the rotation on the T/A box, the
> bolt holes don't line up, so it's probably not worth the effort to even
> try that.
>
> Dave
Home |
Archive |
Main Index |
Thread Index