Re: [ihc] Info needed on tracking widths

[bearbvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Greg Hermann)]

At 5:27 PM 1/29/04, Ryan Moore wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Rocky Lear" <rockylear@domain.elided>
>To: <ihc-digest@domain.elided>
>Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 16:59
>Subject: [ihc] Info needed on tracking widths
>
>
>> Hello all! I need to know the tracking width (WMS to WMS measurement) for
>the front and rear of an early 70's 1310 4x4. Would this measurement for a
>one ton be the same as a 1210 4x4? I know the rear is a little wider but I
>need to know how much wider. Thanks in advance!
>>
>> Rocky

The 8 hole IH 70F's had different flange to flange measurements for single
wheel vs. dual wheel applications.

The 6 hole IH 70F's were ALL THE SAME. I believe that the dual rear wheel
1300 4x4's with 6 hole wheels came with different (single offset) wheels on
the front !!!

Can't tell you the flangle to flange measurement for a 6 hole IH 70F,
changed mine to (also 6 hole) Dodge W-400 hubs and associated 14" brakes
long ago so as to run dual wheels all around.

The 70 F housings are all the same width knuckle to knuckle, EXCEPT for the
ones (REAL wide) which came in 1600 4x4's. Same width as the Dodge 70F
housings, too, including the D-400 ones.

Greg
>
>single wheel?
>
>-Ryan