IHC/IHC Digest Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Pertronix
Steve,
To the extent that you did a good job of explaining it, it made good
sense.
Thanks,
John H.
----------
From: owner-ihc-digest@domain.elided (ihc-digest)
To: ihc-digest@domain.elided
Subject: ihc-digest V6 #797
Date: Mon, May 3, 1999, 4:06 PM
I think the phasing difference between points and Pertronix has to do
with
the fact that the points actually fire the spark on the ramp of the
lobe on
the distributor shaft cam, whereas the Petronix fires right at the top
of the
lobe. (Assuming you didn't rotate the distributor) I would assume that
Pertronix made the module to be in the same place (directly across
from the
magnet), that would make the rubbing block of the points would sit (at
the
high point of the lobe of the distributor), with the distributor
housing in
the exact same position. Does any of this make sense?
STeve
Home |
Archive |
Main Index |
Thread Index