Re: Scout versus ScoutII

[Tom Mandera <tsm1@domain.elided>]

On Sat, 13 Mar 1999 MikeIIDC@domain.elided wrote:
> You see, I always looked at it the opposite.  I viewed the 80/800 as the
> more "manly" vehicle, because it was not making concessions to be
> II, just a Scout) was shorter, narrower, and thus could get places that
> the Scout II couldn't.  Maybe didn't ride as smoothly, or have the

Hmmm.. my Scout II hasn't had a problem going anywhere an Early Bronco or 
a CJ5 can go.. so I doubt a Scout 80/800 could get anywhere I can't go!  

Sure, my Scout gains a few scars in the process but....

-Tom "The top is *OFF*!" Mandera, Helena MT
http://www.tmcom.com/~tsm1/scout