Re: Scout versus ScoutII

To: PGNLV@domain.elided
Subject: Re: Scout versus ScoutII
From: cookiedan@domain.elided (Daniel Nees)
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 16:00:14 -0500 (EST)
Cc: ihc@domain.elided
Content-Disposition: Inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: PGNLV@domain.elided's message of Fri, 12 Mar 1999 15:47:52 EST
Reply-To: cookiedan@domain.elided (Daniel Nees)
Sender: owner-ihc@domain.elided

Well, in a simple form the Scout is more primitive than the Scout II.
The Scout didn't have power stering, AC, power brakes. The Scout II's
body is slightly longer, and it's wheel width is wider.
I think the 80/800's are cute whereas the scout II's are manly! (That
should start something.) 

_____Dan Nees_____
cookiedan@domain.elided
http://members.tripod.com/~IHCaholic/scoutindex.html
http://www.triplediamond.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scout versus ScoutII
  - From: MikeIIDC@domain.elided

Prev by Date: Scout versus ScoutII
Next by Date: Another Binder Weekend?
Prev by thread: Re: Scout versus ScoutII
Next by thread: Re: Scout versus ScoutII
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index