Re: Scout trannies

To: n9ads@domain.elided (Howard R Pletcher)
Subject: Re: Scout trannies
From: cookiedan@domain.elided (Daniel Nees)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 18:09:21 -0500 (EST)
Cc: IHC-Digest@domain.elided
Content-Disposition: Inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: n9ads@domain.elided (Howard R Pletcher)'s message of Sun, 22 Nov1998 22:39:35 EST
Reply-To: cookiedan@domain.elided (Daniel Nees)
Sender: owner-ihc@domain.elided

Howard,
   So were the two B-W trannies differenet? If they were, then which one
is the one that is the weak tranny?

Dan Nees
cookiedan@domain.elided
The
"Good" 1979 Scout II  345/auto 
The
"Bad" 1971 Scout II 304/T-18 
And the
"Ugly" 1979 Scout II 345/auto 

http://members.tripod.com/~IHCaholic/scoutindex.html

Prev by Date: Re: COMANC(HE?) Label
Next by Date: Re: ABS & brake controllers
Prev by thread: RE: Scout trannies
Next by thread: 1981 Scout II's
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index