IHC/IHC Digest Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Choke Settings and Point Dwell
- To: n9ads@domain.elided (Howard R Pletcher)
- Subject: Re: Choke Settings and Point Dwell
- From: jlandry@domain.elided (John A. Landry)
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 06:48:10 GMT
- Cc: ihc@domain.elided
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <19971123.215848.7735.15.n9ads@domain.elided>
- References: <19971122200919.AAA2187@localname> <19971123.215848.7735.15.n9ads@domain.elided>
- Reply-To: jlandry@domain.elided (John A. Landry)
- Sender: owner-ihc@domain.elided
n9ads@domain.elided (Howard R Pletcher) scribbled in the sand:
>This is not a official explanation that I learned somewhere, but only my
>guess as to the reason for the new/used point setting difference. It
>seems to me that the new points will probably wear down their rubbing
>block more quickly than used points as there are probably a few high
>points establishing the gap initially and .019 will quickly close to
>.016. Not as exotic as your carbon build-up reasoning, but it seems
>logical to me.
Sounds reasonable to me also Howard... sounds like a good science fair
project! <grin>
Take care,
John
------------------------------------------------------------------------
jlandry@domain.elided |
Conservative Libertarian | Scout(R) the America others pass by
Life Member of the NRA | in the Scout Traveler escape-machine.
WA Arms Collectors |
Commercial Helicopter - Inst. | 1976 Scout Traveler, V345A, 727, 3.54
http://www.halcyon.com/jlandry/ |
Home |
Archive |
Main Index |
Thread Index